Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Vincentown Race Report


2012 Vincentown Sprint Triathlon Race Report
July 7th, 2012


Background

Location: Vincentown, New Jersey
Distance: 0.27-mile swim/14.4-mile bike/3.3-mile run
2012 Triathlon Race Number: 6
Career Triathlon Race Number: 120
Conditions: HOT—in the 90s.  Sunny and humid.  Modest Wind.  Water temperature near 90 degrees.

Knowing that I really wasn’t ready to race, but also knowing that at 5 triathlons so far this year I’m under-raced, I decided to have a go in this small Jersey DQ sprint triathlon.  I had raced here once before—back in 2009.

I was just two weeks removed from the end of RAAM—Race Across America—and I was still not fully recovered.  This was also the first week of my 12-week IM build for Kona and my legs really felt the effects of the surge in training load.  Further, I had spent the prior two days in NYC with Kara helping her secure a new apartment.  It was brutally hot and I arrived back in Jersey Friday afternoon tired and dehydrated.

Despite drinking 4 large bottles of water Friday night I awoke and in the bathroom soon discovered I was still way under-hydrated.  Also when I awoke, I checked my resting HR and it was 58 bpm—this is a good 15bpm over my normal wake-up HR.  I also knew that today was going to be the hottest day of the summer to boot but still, I was excited to race.  Sometimes my “C” game can be competitive in a race like this.

There were 151 triathletes starting the race and 9 in my 55-59 YO AG.  Before the race, Gary Smith racked next to me.  Gary is in my AG and has a similar profile to me—he’s a LC specialist and has completed many IMs including Kona—in his case several times.  Notably, we both raced Kona in 2010 and he was about 2 hours faster than me.  Gary is a MOP Kona Ironman Age Grouper.  I, on the other had, am a decidedly bottom third competitor in that race.  Given where I was body-wise, I was hopeful to not embarrass myself this morning.  Also in the race was Tom Senff, whom I raced 6-7 years ago and as I recall, he usually beat me—but not by much.  It would be interesting to see how our bodies had fared (relatively) as we entered and then reached our mid-50s.

The Swim

This swim takes place in one of the worst places you should ever have to swim in a triathlon.  First, the RD measured the water at 90 degrees!  No wetsuits of-course, but that temp is ridiculous!   When I jumped in it seemed more like 85 or so to me.  Second, the swim is in a small pond-like body of water that is a “cedar lake”, which means that you can’t really see anything.  Third, there is a lot of vegetative matter on the bottom of the lake and when the triathletes wade in it gets stirred up emitting quite an unpleasant odor.

I wore my TYR Torque and lined up way right in this out-and back, left turning swim course.  Those of you who have read my RRs in the past know that I’m a pretty solid wetsuit swimmer but my competitiveness dramatically decreases without a wetsuit.  I seem to slow-down without a wetsuit more than most people.  This is due to my late introduction to swimming and my very weak kick.  Still on this morning, I felt pretty good about my swim—I focused on being in control and being in the mix when I hopped on my bike.

My swim was uneventful and I cruised around the pond at about 90 %.  I knew I could go faster but given the heat, I wanted to err on the conservative side.  I hit the shore with an 8:03 swim split.  My Garmin had the swim at 0.27-miles and recorded 286 strokes for me, which is about 1.66 yards/stroke.  By comparison, at Hammonton, with my wetsuit, I averaged 2.22 yards/stroke—a 25% reduction in average length per stroke.  I averaged 36 strokes/min—the same as I did in Hammonton—so my body position—with and without wetsuit caused me to go 25% slower today than Hammonton—which is quite remarkable—and in other words, with a wetsuit, I do this in 6:02.

That’s theory, but in practice my 8:03 is slower than the 7:31 I did back in 2009 with my wetsuit.  In 2009 this was good enough for the 78.9 %-tile.  Today I am at the 68.2 %-tile OA.  Still, I have the 2nd fastest in my AG (88.9 %-tile) and I’m just 2 seconds off the lead—I certainly didn’t embarrass myself this morning:

1.  Senff                        --------
2.  Christofferson           + 0:02
3.  Smith                       + 0:12
4.  Denko                      + 0:17
5.  Zobel                       + 0:42

Transition One

I don’t see Senff as I run through transition even though I obviously passed him there.  Without my wetsuit, I seem to have a great T1.  Right before I leave T1, Smith runs up and I know the early advantage is mine.

I record a 1:21 transition split and my Garmin reports I ran 523 feet in transition.  From a competitive perspective, this is great news indeed.  I have a much better T1 than anyone else in my AG (Smith is 19 seconds slower and no one else is within 30 seconds):

1.  Christofferson           --------
2.  Smith                       + 0:23
3.  Senff                        + 0:33
4.  Denko                      + 1:07
5.  Zobel                       + 1:21

Overall, I have the 13th best T1 (92.1 %-tile).  In 2009, I had the 33rd/84.3 %-tile T1 and was 3rd in my AG.  Very satisfying, especially since it’s been 4 weeks since I last raced a triathlon.

The Bike

Even short of it’s advertised distance, the bike at 14.4-miles suits me.  In 2009, I did the course in 36:28 (23.9 mph) and averaged 260 watts at an average HR of 160bpm.  I was curious to see how my body performed today.  With RAAM, I had a tremendous training load in 6 days and could reasonably expect to see a real jump in fitness.  On the other hand, I could tell that even with 2 weeks, my body had not fully recovered yet from RAAM.

I jumped out quickly on the bike and felt amazing.  My watts jumped well north of 300 and I had to consciously slow myself down.  I hit the first mile with an average speed of 21.9 mph, but with an average of 273 watts (84 rpm/159 bpm).  I was very optimistic—I could feel the latent fitness in my legs but I was still cautious—I had been warned about the difficulty that one faces post-RAAM.  My next two miles were still strong, but I was definitely holding back:

Mile 2: 24.8 mph/247 watts/89 rpm/160 bpm
Mile 3: 23.4 mph/247 watts/86 rpm/159 bpm

Towards the end of third mile, and despite my low HR, I could really feel my legs “rig-up”.  They were uncharacteristically leaden.  I knew right then that RAAM was still negatively affecting me.  I kept pushing the rest of the ride but it was a struggle.  I just couldn’t go hard enough to really stress my aerobic engine—you can see that in the HR numbers below:

Mile 4: 22.5/242/86/160
Mile 5: 23.9/236/87/159
Mile 6: 24.9/230/88/157
Mile 7: 24.9/242/85/159
Mile 8: 23.2/246/85/160
Mile 9: 23.4/227/87/158
Mile 10: 21.5/224/83/160
Mile 11: 23.6/239/86/159
Mile 12: 23.8/239/86/158
Mile 13: 24.0/228/81/156
Mile 14: 23.6/239/84/158
Mile 14.4: 20.6/246/84/157

For the ride as a whole I averaged 23.4 mph, 240 watts, 85 rpm at an average HR of 158bpm.  My bike split was 36:51, about 23 seconds slower than 2009.  My watts were 20 watts lower as well.  Consequently, I fell from 7th (97.1 %-tile) to 11th (93.4 %-tile) OA.  I still managed the fastest bike split in my AG with Gary the only one hanging close:

1.  Christofferson           --------
2.  Smith                       + 1:05
3.  Senff                        + 4:39
4.  Denko                      + 4:46
5.  Zobel                       + 7:02

Despite the slower speed, power and OA placement, I felt pretty good about this ride.  I believe (or at least I’m hopeful) that I have really improved my bike fitness post RAAM, and as my legs fully absorb that training stimulus and I more fully recover that I will be seeing a nice improvement in races to come—we’ll see.  In any event, I entered T2 with a lead that needed protecting.


Transition Two

I enter T2 feeling pretty good about things.  I know at 240 watts, my bike was somewhat limited in the damage I was able to inflict on my Gary.  Still, I had no idea what his bike was.  I was surprised, frankly, to be ahead of him after the swim and so the optimistic part of me was hopeful I had opened up a big gap.  The realistic side said I probably needed at least 3 minutes to hold him off in the run.   Had I know he was just 65 seconds back I would have know for sure the race was lost right then.

But I didn’t know that and hurried through T2.  My T2 was a disappointing 1:02 and measured 323 feet in length.  My HR was 160 bpm throughout.  I had the 37th fastest T2 OA (76.2 %-tile) and 3rd in my AG as Gary clawed back 17 seconds on me:

1.  Christofferson           --------
2.  Smith                       + 0:48
3.  Senff                        + 5:00
4.  Denko                      + 5:05
5.  Zobel                       + 7:02

The Run

Very, very hot.  Very, very dead legs.  I knew I was really, really slow today.  Gary caught me just past one mile and at the out and back, I could tell no one else was close so I just mailed it in.  I clocked the run at 3.3 miles.  My splits were: 8:15/165, 8:32/162, 8:50/162, and for the last 0.3 7:48/166.  My run split ended up being 27:22.  Only 3 guys broke 20 minutes and Gary, while being the fastest in our AG, only clocked 24:05.  It was a long course and a slow day.  And on top of that I was about as slow as I’ve ever been in a triathlon sprint run.  Still, I felt good afterwards and was able to put a big 4+ hour training day the next day—onward and upward towards Kona!

I was 4th in my AG and 67th OA (56.3 %-tile) for the run.  for the race as a whole, I finished 31st OA (80.1 %-tile).  Here are the final AG standings:

1.  Smith                       --------
2.  Christofferson           + 2:26
3.  Denko                      + 7:08
4.  Senff                        + 7:45
5.  Zobel                       + 8:56

No comments: